On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 10:30:29PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > On 2004-08-13T11:54:41, > Jonathan Stanton <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> said: > > > If you havn't looked at it already, you might want to try out the Spread > > group communication system. > > > > http://www.spread.org/ > > The intel lawyers have identified the Spread license to be > GPL-incompatible. > > Otherwise, I agree, Spread is very nice. If those issues could be > resolved, that may be an interesting option too. > > (I think the advertising clause and something else clash with the > (L)GPL; I can put you in contact with the Intel folks if you wish to > resolve this.) I would appreciate that. We did choose our licensing for what I think are good reasons, but we have also worked in the past with outside projects with possible license conflicts and have been able to resolve them. So I would like to understand exactly what the issues are. Cheers, Jonathan -- ------------------------------------------------------- Jonathan R. Stanton jonathan@xxxxxxxxxx Dept. of Computer Science Johns Hopkins University -------------------------------------------------------