Re: [Linux-cluster] Re: [cgl_discussion] Re: [dcl_discussion] Clustersummit materials

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 10:30:29PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2004-08-13T11:54:41,
>    Jonathan Stanton <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
> 
> > If you havn't looked at it already, you might want to try out the Spread
> > group communication system. 
> > 
> > http://www.spread.org/
> 
> The intel lawyers have identified the Spread license to be
> GPL-incompatible.
> 
> Otherwise, I agree, Spread is very nice. If those issues could be
> resolved, that may be an interesting option too.
> 
> (I think the advertising clause and something else clash with the
> (L)GPL; I can put you in contact with the Intel folks if you wish to
> resolve this.)

I would appreciate that. We did choose our licensing for what I think are 
good reasons, but we have also worked in the past with outside projects 
with possible license conflicts and have been able to resolve them. So I 
would like to understand exactly what the issues are. 

Cheers,

Jonathan

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------
Jonathan R. Stanton         jonathan@xxxxxxxxxx
Dept. of Computer Science   
Johns Hopkins University    
-------------------------------------------------------


[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux