On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 13:37, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > On 2004-08-12T10:42:16, > Steven Dake <sdake@xxxxxxxxxx> said: > > > agreed... Transis in kernel would be a fine alternative to openais gmi > > in kernel. > > > > Speaking of transis, is the code posted anywhere? I'd like to have a > > look. > > It's not yet at the final location, but we put up what we got at > http://wiki.trick.ca/linux-ha/Transis . > > Lars Thanks for posting transis. I had a look at the examples and API. The API is of course different then openais and focused on client/server architecture. I tried a performance test by sending a 64k message, and then receiving it 10 times with two nodes. This operation takes about 5 seconds on my hardware which is 128k/sec. I was expecting more like 8-10MB/sec. Is there anything that can be done to improve the performance? Thanks -steve Certainly a different sort of API then openais... > Sincerely, > Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@xxxxxxx>
