Re: [Linux-cluster] Re: [cgl_discussion] Re: [dcl_discussion] Clustersummit materials

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2004-08-12T15:59:10,
   Steven Dake <sdake@xxxxxxxxxx> said:

> Thanks for posting transis.  I had a look at the examples and API.  The
> API is of course different then openais and focused on client/server
> architecture.

Right.

> I tried a performance test by sending a 64k message, and then receiving
> it 10 times with two nodes.  This operation takes about 5 seconds on my
> hardware which is 128k/sec.  I was expecting more like 8-10MB/sec.  Is
> there anything that can be done to improve the performance?

I've not yet done any real tests with it, so I'm not sure. We were
mostly going from the theoretical description ;) But I think 128k/s is
really a bit low, so I assume something ain't quite right yet... We'll
figure it out.

It's possible that maybe it's not the way to go afterall, but before we
could go looking we first needed it as GPL/LGPL (for not becoming
IP-tainted).


Sincerely,
    Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@xxxxxxx>

-- 
High Availability & Clustering	    \        This space          /
SUSE Labs, Research and Development |       intentionally        |
SUSE LINUX AG - A Novell company    \        left blank          /


[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux