Re: [PATCH 1/9] cgroup/cpuset-v1: Add deprecation warnings to sched_load_balance and memory_pressure_enabled

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 08:04:06AM -1000, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm apprehensive about adding warning messages which may be triggered
> consistently without anything end users can do about them.

That means you'd distinguish RE (replacement exists) vs DN (dropped as
non-ideal) categories?


> I think that deprecation messages, unless such deprecation is
> immediate and would have direct consequences on how the system can be
> used, should be informational.

I could subscribe to that if there weren't so many other places to
evaluate:
  $ git grep -i "pr_warn.*deprec" torvalds/master --  | wc -l
  62
  $ git grep -i "pr_info.*deprec" torvalds/master --  | wc -l
  2

So is the disctinction worth the hassle?

Michal

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux