Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm: Simplify split_page_memcg()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04.11.24 22:05, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
The last argument to split_page_memcg() is now always 0, so remove it,
effectively reverting commit b8791381d7ed.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  include/linux/memcontrol.h |  4 ++--
  mm/memcontrol.c            | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
  mm/page_alloc.c            |  4 ++--
  3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index 5502aa8e138e..a787080f814f 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ static inline void memcg_memory_event_mm(struct mm_struct *mm,
  	rcu_read_unlock();
  }
-void split_page_memcg(struct page *head, int old_order, int new_order);
+void split_page_memcg(struct page *first, int order);
#else /* CONFIG_MEMCG */ @@ -1463,7 +1463,7 @@ void count_memcg_event_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, enum vm_event_item idx)
  {
  }
-static inline void split_page_memcg(struct page *head, int old_order, int new_order)
+static inline void split_page_memcg(struct page *first, int order)
  {
  }
  #endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG */
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 5e44d6e7591e..506439a5dcfe 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -3034,25 +3034,27 @@ void __memcg_slab_free_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
  }
/*
- * Because folio_memcg(head) is not set on tails, set it now.
+ * The memcg data is only set on the first page, now transfer it to all the
+ * other pages.
   */
-void split_page_memcg(struct page *head, int old_order, int new_order)
+void split_page_memcg(struct page *first, int order)
  {
-	struct folio *folio = page_folio(head);
+	unsigned long memcg_data = first->memcg_data;
+	struct obj_cgroup *objcg;
  	int i;
-	unsigned int old_nr = 1 << old_order;
-	unsigned int new_nr = 1 << new_order;
+	unsigned int nr = 1 << order;
- if (mem_cgroup_disabled() || !folio_memcg_charged(folio))
+	if (!memcg_data)
  		return;
>   > -	for (i = new_nr; i < old_nr; i += new_nr)
-		folio_page(folio, i)->memcg_data = folio->memcg_data;
+	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE((memcg_data & OBJEXTS_FLAGS_MASK) != MEMCG_DATA_KMEM,
+			first);
+	objcg = (void *)(memcg_data & ~OBJEXTS_FLAGS_MASK);

I'm not sure if dropping the

	if (mem_cgroup_disabled() || !folio_memcg_charged(folio))

end adding that OBJEXTS_FLAGS_MASK magic here is the right thing to do.

It also isn't really part of a revert of b8791381d7ed.


--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux