Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm: Opencode split_page_memcg() in __split_huge_page()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04.11.24 22:05, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
This is in preparation for only handling kmem pages in
__split_huge_page().

Did you mean "in split_page_memcg()"?


Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  mm/huge_memory.c | 11 +++++++++--
  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index f92068864469..44d25a74b611 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -3234,6 +3234,10 @@ static void __split_huge_page_tail(struct folio *folio, int tail,
  		folio_set_large_rmappable(new_folio);
  	}
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
+	new_folio->memcg_data = folio->memcg_data;
> +#endif> +
  	/* Finally unfreeze refcount. Additional reference from page cache. */
  	page_ref_unfreeze(page_tail,
  		1 + ((!folio_test_anon(folio) || folio_test_swapcache(folio)) ?
@@ -3267,8 +3271,11 @@ static void __split_huge_page(struct page *page, struct list_head *list,
  	int order = folio_order(folio);
  	unsigned int nr = 1 << order;
- /* complete memcg works before add pages to LRU */
-	split_page_memcg(head, order, new_order);
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
+	if (folio_memcg_charged(folio))

Do we have the mem_cgroup_disabled() call here?

Apart from that LGTM.

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux