On Sat, Oct 26, 2024 at 09:26:04AM -0600, Yu Zhao wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2024 at 12:34 AM Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 06:23:02PM GMT, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > > While updating the generation of the folios, MGLRU requires that the
> > > folio's memcg association remains stable. With the charge migration
> > > deprecated, there is no need for MGLRU to acquire locks to keep the
> > > folio and memcg association stable.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Andrew, can you please apply the following fix to this patch after your
> > unused fixup?
>
> Thanks!
syzbot caught the following:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 85 at mm/vmscan.c:3140 folio_update_gen+0x23d/0x250 mm/vmscan.c:3140
...
Andrew, can you please fix this in place? Thank you.
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index ddaaff67642e..9a610dbff384 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -3138,7 +3138,6 @@ static int folio_update_gen(struct folio *folio, int gen)
unsigned long new_flags, old_flags = READ_ONCE(folio->flags);
VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(gen >= MAX_NR_GENS);
- VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held());
do {
/* lru_gen_del_folio() has isolated this page? */
