Re: [PATCH v1 5/6] memcg-v1: no need for memcg locking for MGLRU

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Oct 26, 2024 at 12:34 AM Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 06:23:02PM GMT, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > While updating the generation of the folios, MGLRU requires that the
> > folio's memcg association remains stable. With the charge migration
> > deprecated, there is no need for MGLRU to acquire locks to keep the
> > folio and memcg association stable.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Andrew, can you please apply the following fix to this patch after your
> unused fixup?

Thanks!

> index fd7171658b63..b8b0e8fa1332 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -3353,7 +3353,7 @@ static struct folio *get_pfn_folio(unsigned long pfn, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>         if (folio_nid(folio) != pgdat->node_id)
>                 return NULL;
>
> -       if (folio_memcg_rcu(folio) != memcg)
> +       if (folio_memcg(folio) != memcg)
>                 return NULL;
>
>         /* file VMAs can contain anon pages from COW */
>
>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux