On Mon Apr 29, 2024 at 7:18 PM EEST, Haitao Huang wrote: > Hi Jarkko > > On Sun, 28 Apr 2024 17:03:17 -0500, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > On Fri Apr 26, 2024 at 5:28 PM EEST, Dave Hansen wrote: > >> On 4/16/24 07:15, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > >> > On Tue Apr 16, 2024 at 8:42 AM EEST, Huang, Kai wrote: > >> > Yes, exactly. I'd take one week break and cycle the kselftest part > >> > internally a bit as I said my previous response. I'm sure that there > >> > is experise inside Intel how to implement it properly. I.e. take some > >> > time to find the right person, and wait as long as that person has a > >> > bit of bandwidth to go through the test and suggest modifications. > >> > >> Folks, I worry that this series is getting bogged down in the selftests. > >> Yes, selftests are important. But getting _some_ tests in the kernel > >> is substantially more important than getting perfect tests. > >> > >> I don't think Haitao needs to "cycle" this back inside Intel. > > > > The problem with the tests was that they are hard to run anything else > > than Ubuntu (and perhaps Debian). It is hopefully now taken care of. > > Selftests do not have to be perfect but at minimum they need to be > > runnable. > > > > I need ret-test the latest series because it is possible that I did not > > have right flags (I was travelling few days thus have not done it yet). > > > > BR, Jarkko > > > > Let me know if you want me to send v13 before testing or you can just use > the sgx_cg_upstream_v12_plus branch in my repo. > > Also thanks for the "Reviewed-by" tags for other patches. But I've not got > "Reviewed-by" from you for patches #8-12 (not sure I missed). Could you go > through those alsoe when you get chance? So, I compiled v12 branch. Was the only difference in selftests? I can just copy them to the device. BR, Jarkko
