On 4/16/24 07:15, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Tue Apr 16, 2024 at 8:42 AM EEST, Huang, Kai wrote: > Yes, exactly. I'd take one week break and cycle the kselftest part > internally a bit as I said my previous response. I'm sure that there > is experise inside Intel how to implement it properly. I.e. take some > time to find the right person, and wait as long as that person has a > bit of bandwidth to go through the test and suggest modifications. Folks, I worry that this series is getting bogged down in the selftests. Yes, selftests are important. But getting _some_ tests in the kernel is substantially more important than getting perfect tests. I don't think Haitao needs to "cycle" this back inside Intel.
