Re: [PATCH] cgroup/misc: Store atomic64_t reads to u64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup/misc: Store atomic64_t reads to u64
From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 08:10:44 -1000
Cc: cgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx, jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx, kai.huang@xxxxxxxxx, kristen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-sgx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lizefan.x@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, reinette.chatre@xxxxxxxxx, vipinsh@xxxxxxxxxx, zhiquan1.li@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20230721120231.13916-1-haitao.huang@linux.intel.com>
References: <ZLcXmvDKheCRYOjG@slm.duckdns.org> <20230721120231.13916-1-haitao.huang@linux.intel.com>

On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 05:02:31AM -0700, Haitao Huang wrote:
> Change 'new_usage' type to u64 so it can be compared with unsigned 'max'
> and 'capacity' properly even if the value crosses the signed boundary.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Applied to cgroup/for-6.6.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

References:
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] cgroup/misc: Change counters to be explicit 64bit types
  - From: Tejun Heo
- [PATCH] cgroup/misc: Store atomic64_t reads to u64
  - From: Haitao Huang

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] blk-iocost: fix seq_printf compile type mismatch error
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] docs: cgroup-v1: fix typo
Previous by thread: [PATCH] cgroup/misc: Store atomic64_t reads to u64
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] cgroup/misc: Fix an overflow
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API] [Monitors]

Powered by Linux