On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 06:08:45PM -0700, Haitao Huang wrote: > So the variables can account for resources of huge quantities even on > 32-bit machines. > > Signed-off-by: Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Applied to cgroup/for-6.6 with some whitespace adjustments. I think the code is broken when we cross the signed boundary but that's not a new problem caused by your patch. I think what we should do is to treat atomic64_t reads as u64 instead of putting it in s64. Thanks. -- tejun
