Re: [PATCH -next 6/6] blk-iocost: move wbt_enable/disable_default() out of spinlock
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject
: Re: [PATCH -next 6/6] blk-iocost: move wbt_enable/disable_default() out of spinlock
From
: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date
: Thu, 11 May 2023 17:25:05 +0200
Cc
: hch@xxxxxx, tj@xxxxxxxxxx, josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxxxx, yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx, cgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, yi.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx, yangerkun@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to
: <
20230511014509.679482-7-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com
>
References
: <
20230511014509.679482-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com
> <
20230511014509.679482-7-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com
>
User-agent
: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Looks good: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
References
:
[PATCH -next 0/6] blk-wbt: minor fix and cleanup
From:
Yu Kuai
[PATCH -next 6/6] blk-iocost: move wbt_enable/disable_default() out of spinlock
From:
Yu Kuai
Prev by Date:
Re: [PATCH -next 5/6] blk-wbt: cleanup rwb_enabled() and wbt_disabled()
Next by Date:
Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: Keep sk->sk_forward_alloc as a proper size
Previous by thread:
[PATCH -next 6/6] blk-iocost: move wbt_enable/disable_default() out of spinlock
Next by thread:
[syzbot] [cgroups?] possible deadlock in freezer_write
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Linux ARM Kernel]
[Linux ARM]
[Linux Omap]
[Fedora ARM]
[IETF Annouce]
[Security]
[Bugtraq]
[Linux OMAP]
[Linux MIPS]
[eCos]
[Asterisk Internet PBX]
[Linux API]
[Monitors]