Re: [PATCH -next 5/6] blk-wbt: cleanup rwb_enabled() and wbt_disabled()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 5/6] blk-wbt: cleanup rwb_enabled() and wbt_disabled()
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 17:23:27 +0200
Cc: hch@xxxxxx, tj@xxxxxxxxxx, josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxxxx, yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx, cgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, yi.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx, yangerkun@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20230511014509.679482-6-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
References: <20230511014509.679482-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> <20230511014509.679482-6-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 09:45:08AM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The code is redundant, reuse rwb_enabled() for wbt_disabled().

This also changes how rwb_enabled is implemented.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH -next 5/6] blk-wbt: cleanup rwb_enabled() and wbt_disabled()
  - From: Yu Kuai

References:
- [PATCH -next 0/6] blk-wbt: minor fix and cleanup
  - From: Yu Kuai
- [PATCH -next 5/6] blk-wbt: cleanup rwb_enabled() and wbt_disabled()
  - From: Yu Kuai

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH -next 4/6] blk-wbt: remove deadcode to handle wbt enable/disable with io inflight
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH -next 6/6] blk-iocost: move wbt_enable/disable_default() out of spinlock
Previous by thread: [PATCH -next 5/6] blk-wbt: cleanup rwb_enabled() and wbt_disabled()
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH -next 5/6] blk-wbt: cleanup rwb_enabled() and wbt_disabled()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API] [Monitors]

Powered by Linux