Re: [PATCH v3] sched: cpuset: Don't rebuild root domains on suspend-resume

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On 01/03/23 17:03, Qais Yousef wrote:
> On 03/01/23 15:26, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > On 01/03/23 12:28, Qais Yousef wrote:
> > > On 03/01/23 08:31, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> > > > Not ignoring you guys here, but it turns out I'm quite bogged down with
> > > > other stuff at the moment. :/ So, apologies and I'll try to get to this
> > > > asap. Thanks a lot for all your efforts and time reviewing so far!
> > > 
> > > Np, I can feel you :-)
> > 
> > Eh. :/
> I hope I did not offend. That was meant as no pressure, I understand.

No offence at all! I meant "we are all on the same boat it seems". :)

> > BTW, do you have a repro script of some sort handy I might play with?
> Sorry no. You'll just need to suspend to ram. I had a simple patch to measure
> the time around the call and trace_printk'ed the result.
> I was working on a android phone which just suspends to ram if you turn the
> screen off and disconnect the usb.

Looks like I could come up with the following deadline/rework-cpusets

which I don't think it's at a point that I feel comfortable to propose
as an RFC (not even sure if it actually makes sense), but it survived my
very light testing.

Could you please take a look and, if it makes some sense in theory, give
it a try on your end?


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux