Hi jens, on 10/18/2022 8:19 PM, Kemeng Shi wrote: > This series contain a few patch to correct comment, correct trace of > vtime_rate and so on. More detail can be found in the respective > changelogs. > > --- > v2: > Thanks Tejun for review and comment! > Add Acked-by tag from Tejun. > Correct description in patch 3/5 and 4/5. > Drop "blk-iocost: Avoid to call current_hweight_max if iocg->inuse > == iocg->active" > Drop "blk-iocost: Remove redundant initialization of struct ioc_gq" > Drop "blk-iocost: Get ioc_now inside weight_updated" > --- > > Kemeng Shi (5): > blk-iocost: Fix typo in comment > blk-iocost: Reset vtime_base_rate in ioc_refresh_params > blk-iocost: Trace vtime_base_rate instead of vtime_rate > blk-iocost: Remove vrate member in struct ioc_now > blk-iocost: Correct comment in blk_iocost_init > > block/blk-iocost.c | 16 +++++++++------- > include/trace/events/iocost.h | 4 ++-- > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) Could you apply this patchset? By the way, my apply for an cloud variant of email was just passed a few days ago. Is this mail still in spam? Thanks. -- Best wishes Kemeng Shi
