On Thu, 2022-07-21 at 14:46 +0800, Jing-Ting Wu wrote: > On Tue, 2022-07-19 at 15:35 +0200, Michal Koutný wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 03:44:21PM +0800, Jing-Ting Wu < > > jing-ting.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Accroding your description, is the following patch corrent? > > > > Yes, this is what I meant (i.e. grace period before invalidating > > the > > removed rstat_css_node). > > > > > If the patch is correct, we will add this patch to our stability > > > test. > > > And we will continue to observe whether the problem is solved. > > > > It'd be great to have such confirmation. > > Thanks for confirm the patch. > We already add patch to our stability test. > We will reply mail if we have any update. > > > > > Thanks, > > Michal > Hi, Michal Use the patch of previous mail, we pass the stability test at previous two week and still testing. I think the patch is helpful to the syndrome. It passed stability test over two week so far. (as-is: < one week failed) Do you help to upstream this patch to mainline? Thank you. Best regards, Jing-Ting Wu > > Best regards, > Jing-Ting Wu