Re: [Bug] race condition at rebind_subsystems()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Jing-Ting.

On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 06:52:10PM +0800, Jing-Ting Wu <jing-ting.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Root cause:
> The rebind_subsystems() is no lock held when move css object from A
> list to B list,then let B's head be treated as css node at
> list_for_each_entry_rcu().

Nice outcome of the analysis.

> The call stack as following:
> kthread
> -> worker_thread
> -> process_one_work
> -> flush_memcg_stats_dwork
> -> __mem_cgroup_flush_stats
> -> cgroup_rstat_flush_irqsafe
> -> cgroup_rstat_flush_locked
> 
> Detail:
> static void cgroup_rstat_flush_locked(struct cgroup *cgrp, bool
> may_sleep)
> {
> ...
>    rcu_read_lock();
>    list_for_each_entry_rcu(css, &pos->rstat_css_list,
>                              rstat_css_node)
>         css->ss->css_rstat_flush(css, cpu);
>    rcu_read_unlock();
> ...
> }
> 
> Because the content of css->ss is not a function address,
> once the css_rstat_flush is called, kernel exception will happen.

I agree with your analysis. The list_for_each_entry_rcu() is not
accounting for the move from A to B and the head's rstat_css_list is
invalid in the cgroup_rstat_flush() context.

> When the issue happened, the list of pos->rstat_css_list at group A is
> empty.
> There must be racing conditions.
> 
> From reviewing code, we find rebind_subsystems() is no lock held when
> move css object to other list.
> 
> int rebind_subsystems(struct cgroup_root *dst_root, u16 ss_mask)
> {
> ...
>    if (ss->css_rstat_flush) {
>          list_del_rcu(&css->rstat_css_node);
>          list_add_rcu(&css->rstat_css_node,
>                       &dcgrp->rstat_css_list);
>    }
> ...
> }
> 
> If we held a css object from A group list, at same time this css object
> was moved to B group list.
> [...]
> Do you have any suggestion for this issue?

The css->rstat_css_node should not be modified if there are possible RCU
readers elsewhere.
One way to fix this would be to insert synchronize_rcu() after
list_del_rcu() and before list_add_rcu().
(A further alternative (I've heard about) would be to utilize 'nulls'
RCU lists [1] to make the move between lists detectable.)

But as I'm looking at it from distance, it may be simpler and sufficient
to just take cgroup_rstat_lock around the list migration (the nesting
under cgroup_mutex that's held with rebind_subsystems() is fine).

HTH,
Michal

[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/RCU/rculist_nulls.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux