On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 2:23 PM kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Yosry, > > Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: > > [auto build test ERROR on bpf-next/master] > > url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Yosry-Ahmed/bpf-rstat-cgroup-hierarchical-stats/20220611-034720 > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master > config: um-i386_defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220611/202206110544.D5cTU0WQ-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config) > compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-3) 11.3.0 > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): > # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/83f297e2b47dc41b511f071b9eadf38339387b41 > git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux > git fetch --no-tags linux-review Yosry-Ahmed/bpf-rstat-cgroup-hierarchical-stats/20220611-034720 > git checkout 83f297e2b47dc41b511f071b9eadf38339387b41 > # save the config file > mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config > make W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > > kernel/cgroup/rstat.c:161:22: warning: no previous prototype for 'bpf_rstat_flush' [-Wmissing-prototypes] > 161 | __weak noinline void bpf_rstat_flush(struct cgroup *cgrp, > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > >> kernel/cgroup/rstat.c:509:10: error: 'const struct btf_kfunc_id_set' has no member named 'sleepable_set'; did you mean 'release_set'? > 509 | .sleepable_set = &bpf_rstat_sleepable_kfunc_ids, > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | release_set > kernel/cgroup/rstat.c:509:27: warning: excess elements in struct initializer > 509 | .sleepable_set = &bpf_rstat_sleepable_kfunc_ids, > | ^ > kernel/cgroup/rstat.c:509:27: note: (near initialization for 'bpf_rstat_kfunc_set') > > > vim +509 kernel/cgroup/rstat.c > > 505 > 506 static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_rstat_kfunc_set = { > 507 .owner = THIS_MODULE, > 508 .check_set = &bpf_rstat_check_kfunc_ids, > > 509 .sleepable_set = &bpf_rstat_sleepable_kfunc_ids, > 510 }; > 511 > > -- > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service > https://01.org/lkp AFAICT these failures are because the patch series depends on a patch in the mailing list [1] that is not in bpf-next, as explained by the cover letter. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220421140740.459558-5-benjamin.tissoires@xxxxxxxxxx/
