On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 12:31:31PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 10:32:14AM +0200, Juri Lelli wrote: > > > Thanks for reporting. The set is based on cgroup/for-next (as of last > > week), though. I can of course rebase on tip/sched/core or mainline if > > needed. > > TJ; I would like to take these patches through the scheduler tree if you > don't mind. Afaict there's no real conflict vs cgroup/for-next (I > applied the patches and then did a pull of cgroup/for-next which > finished without complaints). Yeah, for sure, please go ahead. Thanks. -- tejun