On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 10:32:14AM +0200, Juri Lelli wrote: > Thanks for reporting. The set is based on cgroup/for-next (as of last > week), though. I can of course rebase on tip/sched/core or mainline if > needed. TJ; I would like to take these patches through the scheduler tree if you don't mind. Afaict there's no real conflict vs cgroup/for-next (I applied the patches and then did a pull of cgroup/for-next which finished without complaints).
