Hello, Waiman. On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 01:09:38PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > For me, that is the only good reason why we should keep the current > behavior. So I am fine with that. > > + cgrp->dom_cgrp = cgrp->dom_cgrp; > > However, I am still puzzled by above line of code, should it be just > > cgrp->dom_cgrp = cgrp; Oh I see. Yeah, that's just a silly (harmless) bug. The field gets properly initialized in init_cgroup_housekeeping(). I'll remove that line. Thanks! -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
