Hello, On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 05:12:42PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > Are you referring to keeping the no internal process restriction and > document how to work around that instead? I would like to hear what > workarounds are currently being used. What we've been talking about all along - just creating explicit leaf nodes. > Anyway, you currently allow internal process in thread mode, but not in > non-thread mode. I would prefer no such restriction in both thread and > non-thread mode. Heh, so, these aren't arbitrary. The contraint is tied to implementing resource domains and thread subtree doesn't have resource domains in them, so they don't need the constraint. I'm sorry about the short replies but I'm kinda really tied up right now. I'm gonna do the thread mode so that it can be agnostic w.r.t. the internal process constraint and I think it could be helpful to decouple these discussions. We've been having this discussion for a couple years now and it looks like we're gonna go through it all over, which is fine, but let's at least keep that separate. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
