On 06/01/2017 04:52 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 04:48:48PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: >> I think we are on agreement here. I should we should just document how >> userland can work around the internal process competition issue by >> setting up the cgroup hierarchy properly. Then we can remove the no >> internal process constraint. > Heh, we agree on the immediate solution but not the final direction. > This requirement affects how controllers implement resource control in > significant ways. It is a restriction which can be worked around in > userland relatively easily. I'd much prefer to keep the invariant > intact. > > Thanks. > Are you referring to keeping the no internal process restriction and document how to work around that instead? I would like to hear what workarounds are currently being used. Anyway, you currently allow internal process in thread mode, but not in non-thread mode. I would prefer no such restriction in both thread and non-thread mode. Cheers, Longman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
