Re: legacy mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hello, Serge.
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 03:45:00PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> > If the legacy userspace doesn't do any resource control, the leaf rule
>> > restriction doesn't apply anyway, so nothing to worry about.
>> 
>> My main use case is nested lxc, presumably with systemd inside some of
>> the nested containers, so this would definately be an issue.
>
> W/o controllers in the nested environment, it should be fine.  W/
> controllers, I don't think this is going to fly.  I don't think trying
> to bridge the two versions is a healthy direction in the long term.

Which strongly suggests that the unified hierarchy will never be
deployable as it breaks too much userspace.

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux