Re: legacy mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 04:48:25PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Serge.
> 
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 03:45:00PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > > If the legacy userspace doesn't do any resource control, the leaf rule
> > > restriction doesn't apply anyway, so nothing to worry about.
> > 
> > My main use case is nested lxc, presumably with systemd inside some of
> > the nested containers, so this would definately be an issue.
> 
> W/o controllers in the nested environment, it should be fine.  W/
> controllers, I don't think this is going to fly.  I don't think trying
> to bridge the two versions is a healthy direction in the long term.

That's unfortunate as it suggests that lxcfs is the only way around
this problem :(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux