Re: Possible regression with cgroups in 3.11

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> I have compiled my kernel with CONFIG_MEMCG_SWAP,
>> CONFIG_MEMCG_SWAP_ENABLED, CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM and CONFIG_CGROUP_HUGETLB
>> options, although our machines have no active swap space at the
>> moment.
>
> No swap means that no charges are done by a group non-member. So the
> race Johannes was describing shouldn't be the problem in your case.
>

Disabling CONFIG_MEMCG_SWAP and CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM had no effect.

>> memory.use_hierarchy support is enabled and memory is limited from the
>> job directory. I have mounted the cgroup to /var/slurm/cgroup/memory
>> in addition to the normal directory at /sys/fs/cgroup/memory.
>
> How exactly have you mounted it there?

Mounted now at the correct position.

> Btw. how reproducible is this? Do you think you could try to bisect
> it down? Reducing bisection to mm/ and kernel/ diretories should be
> sufficient I guess.

I tried the one-liner from Johannes, but this also showed no effect.
Bisectioning is still on my todo list, as git does not stay on the
aufs branch and i have to manually merge the aufs patch each step.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux