Re: Possible regression with cgroups in 3.11

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:46:27 -0700 (PDT)
Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, 31 Oct 2013, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 19:09:19 -0700 (PDT)
> > Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > This is, at least on the face of it, distinct from the workqueue
> > > cgroup hang I was outlining to Tejun and Michal and Steve last week:
> > > that also strikes in mem_cgroup_reparent_charges, but in the
> > > lru_add_drain_all rather than in mem_cgroup_start_move: the
> > > drain of pagevecs on all cpus never completes.
> > > 
> > 
> > Did anyone ever run this code with lockdep enabled? There is lockdep
> > annotation in the workqueue that should catch a lot of this.
> 
> I believe I tried before, but I've just rechecked to be sure:
> lockdep is enabled but silent when we get into that deadlock.

Interesting.

Anyway, have you posted a backtrace of the latest lockups you are
seeing? Or possible crash it and have kdump/kexec save a core?

I'd like to take a look at this too.

Thanks,

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux