Re: What's the progress of per cgroup background reclaim?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

2012/3/16 Ying Han <yinghan@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Thank you for the information.
>
> Sounds like that is exactly what the per-memcg kswapd was designed
> for. Two things I am interested to looking into now:
>
> 1. why the per-memcg direct reclaim introduce such noticeable latency
> spike, what workload that can reproduce that?
Sure, I will look into this this week.
>
> 2. we can quickly patch the last version of per-memcg kswapd (V6) on
> your environment and see what difference it makes. Maybe I can help on
> that.
Thanks a lot.
>
> Thanks
>
> --Ying
>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> Zhu Yanhai
>>
>>> --Ying
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Zhu Yanhai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux