Re: What's the progress of per cgroup background reclaim?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Zhu Yanhai <zhu.yanhai@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all,
> Just a quick question, could you please tell me what's the current
> status of the development of per cgroup background reclaim? This topic
> seems to be silent after Han Ying's patchset V7
> (http://lwn.net/Articles/440073/) and Kame's async reclaim patchset V3
> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/5/26/20), and I can't find it in
> memcg-devel tree either.
> Is anyone still working on this?

There were some discussions on going w/ per-memcg kswapd thread or
workqueue by that time. And now I think we agree to go w/ the
per-memcg thread model.  I haven't done much work since then, and one
of questions is to demonstrate the need of this feature.

I am glad you are asking, do you have workload showing problems w/o it?

--Ying

>
> Thanks,
> Zhu Yanhai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux