Re: [RGW][CEPHADM] Multisite configuration and Ingress

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yes, I've read some stories about that in this mailing list, but, my question 
was not clear enough, I want to know what's possible to do with cephadm :
- Is it possible to create several Ingress with cephadm ? (I can't reach my 
test env to test until tomorrow !)
- If we do, how can we configure differently thoses groups of RGWs daemons ? 
(related to my previous question on ceph config / ceph.conf)

Le mercredi 11 septembre 2024, 22:23:14 CEST Anthony D'Atri a écrit :
> I've seen deployments with more than one cohort of RGWs.  E.g.
> 
> * one group of RGWs that serve internal requests with an LB
> * one group of RGWs that serve external requests with a different LB
> * one group of RGWs that only process LC / GC events
> 
> > On Sep 11, 2024, at 4:01 PM, Gilles Mocellin
> > <gilles.mocellin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi again,
> > 
> > I wonder if there is a better way of configuring multisite configuration,
> > especially zone/zonegroup endpoints :
> > 
> > - many endpoints, pointing directly at RGW daemons
> > - one endpoint, pointing at the load balancer VIP of Ingress
> > 
> > If we want to separate client access from replication, is it possible to
> > have two Ingress ? It can be great to have them in two different
> > networks.
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
> > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx



_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux