Re: Reef 18.2.4 EL8 packages ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



We didn't want to stop building on Centos 8, but the way it went end of
life and stopped doing any security updates forced our hand. See this
thread for details [0].

Essentially this made even building and testing with Centos 8 infeasible,
so we suggest users migrate to Centos 9 (so they continue to get security
updates) or run Ceph with containers.

Josh

[0] https://www.spinics.net/lists/dev-ceph/msg06066.html

On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 10:45 AM Konstantin Shalygin <k0ste@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> > On 25 Jul 2024, at 14:39, Noe P. <ml@am-rand.berlin> wrote:
> >
> > I find this 18.2.4 release highly confusing.
> >
> > Can anyone please confirm that EL8 packages are no more supported ?
> > The small remark in the release notes
> >
> >  qa/distros: remove centos 8 from supported distros (pr#57932, Guillaume
> Abrioux, Casey Bodley, Adam King, Laura Flores)
> >
> > is a bit disturbing, in particular between two minor releases.
> > If yes, is the reason the missing support for EL8 distro kernels ?
> >
> > We could build the packages locally, but there is no v18.2.4 tag in git.
>
> I do not think that's possible. Then in the current situation
>
> * if you deployed a Reef on a distribution that initially suited you when
> planning the cluster (CentOS-Stream 8 + Reef), you must resetup all hosts
> to CentOS-Stream 9. Yes, in the middle of the year. Right now (ha-ha)
> * if you are trying to update from a previous release: Pacific to Reef,
> then first you need to upgrade to 18.2.2, which is very buggy. Somehow live
> with bugs (ha-ha-ha). And now perform a resetup of all hosts
>
> This has never happened before - stop packaging in the middle of even
> release cycle (this not the 13, 15, 17 release, where everything is
> possible). I hope common sense, between the distributions on which testing
> is carried out, and the distributions for which packages are assembled (why
> shouldn’t they be assembled if just a few months ago they were assembled
> perfectly on the same package base) - these are different things
>
> Otherwise, we need Zac to correct the information listed in the ABC matrix
> here [1]
>
>
> k
> [1] https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/start/os-recommendations/#platforms
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux