Re: reef 18.2.3 QE validation status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



(cc Thomas Goirand)

in April, an 18.2.3 tarball was uploaded to
https://download.ceph.com/tarballs/ceph_18.2.3.orig.tar.gz. that's been
picked up and packaged by the Debian project under the assumption that it
was a supported release

when we do finally release 18.2.3, we will presumably overwrite that
existing tarball with the latest contents. Thomas has requested that we
re-number this release to 18.2.4 to prevent further confusion. Thomas,
could you explain the consequences of overwriting that tarball in place?

On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 10:06 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> After fixing the issues identified below we cherry-picked all PRs from
> this list for 18.2.3
> https://pad.ceph.com/p/release-cherry-pick-coordination.
>
> The question to the dev leads: do you think we can proceed with the
> release without rerunning suites, as they were already approved?
>
> Please reply with your recommendations.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 4:59 PM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Please see the update from Laura below for the status of this release.
>>
>> Dev Leads help is appreciated to expedite fixes necessary to publish it
>> soon.
>>
>> "Hi all, we have hit another blocker with this release.
>>
>> Due to centos 8 stream going end of life, we only have the option of
>> releasing centos 9 stream containers.
>>
>> However, we did not test the efficacy of centos 9 stream containers
>> against the orch and upgrade suites during the initial 18.2.3 release cycle.
>>
>> This problem is tracked here: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/66334
>>
>> What needs to happen now is:
>>
>> 1.  The orch team needs to fix all references to centos 8 stream in the
>> orch suite
>> 2.  fs, rados, etc. need to fix their relative jobs the same way in the
>> upgrade suite
>>
>> The easiest way to tackle that is to raise a PR against main and backport
>> to stable releases since this problem actually affects main and all other
>> releases.
>>
>> Then, we will:
>>
>> 1.  Rerun orch and upgrade with these fixes
>> 2.  Re-approve orch and upgrade
>> 3.  Re-upgrade gibba and LRC
>>
>> Then the release will be unblocked."
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 3:26 PM Laura Flores <lflores@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Rados results were approved, and we successfully upgraded the gibba
>>> cluster.
>>>
>>> Now waiting on @Dan Mick <dmick@xxxxxxxxxx> to upgrade the LRC.
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 8:32 PM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I reran rados on the fix
>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/57794/commits
>>>> and seeking approvals from Radek and Laure
>>>>
>>>> https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/65393#note-1
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 2:12 PM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > We have discovered some issues (#1 and #2) during the final stages of
>>>> > testing that require considering a delay in this point release until
>>>> > all options and risks are assessed and resolved.
>>>> >
>>>> > We will keep you all updated on the progress.
>>>> >
>>>> > Thank you for your patience!
>>>> >
>>>> > #1 https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/66260
>>>> > #2 https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/61948#note-21
>>>> >
>>>> > On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 3:41 PM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > We've run into a problem during the last verification steps before
>>>> > > publishing this release after upgrading the LRC to it  =>
>>>> > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/65733
>>>> > >
>>>> > > After this issue is resolved, we will continue testing and
>>>> publishing
>>>> > > this point release.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Thanks for your patience!
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 11:29 PM Christian Rohmann
>>>> > > <christian.rohmann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > On 18.04.24 8:13 PM, Laura Flores wrote:
>>>> > > > > Thanks for bringing this to our attention. The leads have
>>>> decided that
>>>> > > > > since this PR hasn't been merged to main yet and isn't
>>>> approved, it
>>>> > > > > will not go in v18.2.3, but it will be prioritized for v18.2.4.
>>>> > > > > I've already added the PR to the v18.2.4 milestone so it's sure
>>>> to be
>>>> > > > > picked up.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Thanks a bunch. If you miss the train, you miss the train - fair
>>>> enough.
>>>> > > > Nice to know there is another one going soon and that bug is
>>>> going to be
>>>> > > > on it !
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Regards
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Christian
>>>> > > > _______________________________________________
>>>> > > > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
>>>> > > > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
>>>> > > >
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Laura Flores
>>>
>>> She/Her/Hers
>>>
>>> Software Engineer, Ceph Storage <https://ceph.io>
>>>
>>> Chicago, IL
>>>
>>> lflores@xxxxxxx | lflores@xxxxxxxxxx <lflores@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> M: +17087388804
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux