Re: Are ceph commands backward compatible?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 12:18 AM Satoru Takeuchi
<satoru.takeuchi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> 2024年6月14日(金) 23:24 Anthony D'Atri <aad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > Usually.  There is a high bar for changing command structure or output.
> > Newer versions are more likely to *add* commands and options than to change
> > or remove them.
> >
> > That said, probably some things now won't take a --cluster argument since
> > vanity names are deprecated, similarly with filestore.
> >
> > One exception that still pisses me off is when the mon time skew was
> > factored out of ceph -s into a separate command
> >
>
>
> Thank you for your answer. I understood. Your comment matches what I had
> inferred from reviewing changelogs so far.

Hi Satoru,

For rbd in particular, we try to be as compatible as possible -- we
have actually rejected some improvements to structured output (--format
json or --format xml) in the past to stay compatible.  As long as you
stick to structured output instead of parsing human-readable output,
I would expect the same shell script to work for quite for a number of
releases, but it's not really tested.

Thanks,

                Ilya
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux