2024年6月14日(金) 23:24 Anthony D'Atri <aad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Usually. There is a high bar for changing command structure or output. > Newer versions are more likely to *add* commands and options than to change > or remove them. > > That said, probably some things now won't take a --cluster argument since > vanity names are deprecated, similarly with filestore. > > One exception that still pisses me off is when the mon time skew was > factored out of ceph -s into a separate command > Thank you for your answer. I understood. Your comment matches what I had inferred from reviewing changelogs so far. Best, Satoru > > > On Jun 13, 2024, at 21:00, Satoru Takeuchi <satoru.takeuchi@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm developing some tools that execute ceph commands like rbd. During > > development, > > I have come to wonder about compatibility of ceph commands. > > > > I'd like to use ceph commands which version is >= the version used by > > ceph daemons. > > It results in executing new ceph commands against ceph clusters using > > old versions. > > So I'd like to know my tools are expected to work fine. Coud someone > tell me > > whether ceph commands are backword compatible? > > > > The officlal document didn't have the information I needed. > > > > Thanks, > > Satoru > > _______________________________________________ > > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx > > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |