Re: Why you might want packages not containers for Ceph deployments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dear Nico,

do you think it is sensible and it's a precise statement saying that "we can't reduce complexity by adding a layer of complexity"?  
Containers are always adding a so-called layer, but people keep using them, and in some cases, they offload complexity from another side. 
Claiming the "complexity", without explaining examining the details is pure FUD. 
"complexity, OMG!!!111!!!" is not enough of a statement. You have to explain what complexity you gain and what complexity you reduce. 
Installing SeaweedFS consists of the following: `cd seaweedfs/weed && make install`
This is the type of problem that Ceph is trying to solve, and starting a discussion by saying that everything is bad, without providing any helpful message is useless FUD. 

Max
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux