Re: reef 18.2.1 QE Validation status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks Guiilaume and Redo for tracking down this issue. After talking more
with Guillaume I now realized that not all the tests were using the
expected latest-reef-devel label so Rook tests were incorrectly showing
green for Reef. :(
Now that I ran the tests again in the test PR
<https://github.com/rook/rook/pull/13203> with all tests using the
latest-reef-devel label, all the tests with OSDs on PVCs are failing that
use ceph-volume raw mode. So this is a blocker for Rook scenarios, we
really need to fix to avoid breaking OSDs.

Thanks,
Travis

On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 1:03 PM Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Yuri, (thanks)
>
> Indeed, we had a regression in ceph-volume impacting rook scenarios which
> was supposed to be fixed by [1].
> It turns out rook's CI didn't catch that fix wasn't enough for some reason
> (I believe the CI run wasn't using the right image, Travis might confirm or
> give more details).
> Another patch [2] is needed in order to fix this regression.
>
> Let me know if more details are needed.
>
> Thanks,
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/54429/commits/ee26074a5e7e90b4026659bf3adb1bc973595e91
> [2] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/54514/files
>
>
> --
> Guillaume Abrioux
> Software Engineer
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx>
> *Sent:* 15 November 2023 20:23
> *To:* Nizamudeen A <nia@xxxxxxxxxx>; Guillaume Abrioux <
> gabrioux@xxxxxxxxxx>; Travis Nielsen <tnielsen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> *Cc:* Adam King <adking@xxxxxxxxxx>; Redouane Kachach <rkachach@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> dev <dev@xxxxxxx>; ceph-users <ceph-users@xxxxxxx>
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL]  Re: reef 18.2.1 QE Validation status
>
> This is on behalf of Guillaume.
>
> We have one more last mites issue that may have to be included
> https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/63545
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/54514
>
> Travis, Redo, Guillaume will provide more context and details.
>
> We are assessing the situation as 18.2.1 has been built and signed.
>
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 11:07 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> > OK thx!
> >
> > We have completed the approvals.
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 9:13 AM Nizamudeen A <nia@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > dashboard approved. Failure known and unrelated!
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2023, 22:34 Adam King <adking@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> orch approved.  After reruns, orch/cephadm was just hitting two known
> (nonblocker) issues and orch/rook teuthology suite is known to not be
> functional currently.
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 10:33 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Build 4 with https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/54224  was built and
> I
> > >>> ran the tests below and asking for approvals:
> > >>>
> > >>> smoke - Laura
> > >>> rados/mgr - PASSED
> > >>> rados/dashboard - Nizamudeen
> > >>> orch - Adam King
> > >>>
> > >>> See Build 4 runs - https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/63443#note-1
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 12:21 AM Redouane Kachach <
> rkachach@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Yes, cephadm has some tests for monitoring that should be enough
> to ensure basic functionality is working properly. The rest of the changes
> in the PR are for rook orchestrator.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 5:04 AM Nizamudeen A <nia@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> dashboard changes are minimal and approved. and since the
> dashboard change is related to the
> > >>> >> monitoring stack (prometheus..) which is something not covered in
> the dashboard test suites, I don't think running it is necessary.
> > >>> >> But maybe the cephadm suite has some monitoring stack related
> testings written?
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 1:10 AM Yuri Weinstein <
> yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> Ack Travis.
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> Since it touches a dashboard, Nizam - please reply/approve.
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> I assume that rados/dashboard tests will be sufficient, but
> expecting
> > >>> >>> your recommendations.
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> This addition will make the final release likely to be pushed.
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 11:30 AM Travis Nielsen <
> tnielsen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>> >>> >
> > >>> >>> > I'd like to see these changes for much improved dashboard
> integration with Rook. The changes are to the rook mgr orchestrator module,
> and supporting test changes. Thus, this should be very low risk to the ceph
> release. I don't know the details of the tautology suites, but I would
> think suites involving the mgr modules would only be necessary.
> > >>> >>> >
> > >>> >>> > Travis
> > >>> >>> >
> > >>> >>> > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 12:14 PM Yuri Weinstein <
> yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>> >>> >>
> > >>> >>> >> Redouane
> > >>> >>> >>
> > >>> >>> >> What would be a sufficient level of testing (tautology
> suite(s))
> > >>> >>> >> assuming this PR is approved to be added?
> > >>> >>> >>
> > >>> >>> >> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 9:13 AM Redouane Kachach <
> rkachach@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>> >>> >> >
> > >>> >>> >> > Hi Yuri,
> > >>> >>> >> >
> > >>> >>> >> > I've just backported to reef several fixes that I
> introduced in the last months for the rook orchestrator. Most of them are
> fixes for dashboard issues/crashes that only happen on Rook environments.
> The PR [1] has all the changes and it was merged into reef this morning. We
> really need these changes to be part of the next reef release as the
> upcoming Rook stable version will be based on it.
> > >>> >>> >> >
> > >>> >>> >> > Please, can you include those changes in the upcoming reef
> 18.2.1 release?
> > >>> >>> >> >
> > >>> >>> >> > [1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/54224
> > >>> >>> >> >
> > >>> >>> >> > Thanks a lot,
> > >>> >>> >> > Redouane.
> > >>> >>> >> >
> > >>> >>> >> >
> > >>> >>> >> > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 6:03 PM Yuri Weinstein <
> yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>> >>> >> >>
> > >>> >>> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> > >>> >>> >> >> From: Venky Shankar <vshankar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >>> >>> >> >> Date: Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 11:52 PM
> > >>> >>> >> >> Subject: Re:  Re: reef 18.2.1 QE Validation
> status
> > >>> >>> >> >> To: Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >>> >>> >> >> Cc: dev <dev@xxxxxxx>, ceph-users <ceph-users@xxxxxxx>
> > >>> >>> >> >>
> > >>> >>> >> >>
> > >>> >>> >> >> Hi Yuri,
> > >>> >>> >> >>
> > >>> >>> >> >> On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 4:55 AM Yuri Weinstein <
> yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>> >>> >> >> >
> > >>> >>> >> >> > I've updated all approvals and merged PRs in the tracker
> and it looks
> > >>> >>> >> >> > like we are ready for gibba, LRC upgrades pending
> approval/update from
> > >>> >>> >> >> > Venky.
> > >>> >>> >> >>
> > >>> >>> >> >> The smoke test failure is caused by missing (kclient)
> patches in
> > >>> >>> >> >> Ubuntu 20.04 that certain parts of the fs suite (via smoke
> tests) rely
> > >>> >>> >> >> on. More details here
> > >>> >>> >> >>
> > >>> >>> >> >>         https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/63488#note-8
> > >>> >>> >> >>
> > >>> >>> >> >> The kclient tests in smoke pass with other distro's and
> the fs suite
> > >>> >>> >> >> tests have been reviewed and look good. Run details are
> here
> > >>> >>> >> >>
> > >>> >>> >> >>
> https://tracker.ceph.com/projects/cephfs/wiki/Reef#07-Nov-2023
> > >>> >>> >> >>
> > >>> >>> >> >> The smoke failure is noted as a known issue for now.
> Consider this run
> > >>> >>> >> >> as "fs approved".
> > >>> >>> >> >>
> > >>> >>> >> >> >
> > >>> >>> >> >> > On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 1:31 PM Radoslaw Zarzynski <
> rzarzyns@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>> >>> >> >> > >
> > >>> >>> >> >> > > rados approved!
> > >>> >>> >> >> > >
> > >>> >>> >> >> > > Details are here:
> https://tracker.ceph.com/projects/rados/wiki/REEF#1821-Review .
> > >>> >>> >> >> > >
> > >>> >>> >> >> > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 10:33 PM Yuri Weinstein <
> yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>> >>> >> >> > > >
> > >>> >>> >> >> > > > Details of this release are summarized here:
> > >>> >>> >> >> > > >
> > >>> >>> >> >> > > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/63443#note-1
> > >>> >>> >> >> > > >
> > >>> >>> >> >> > > > Seeking approvals/reviews for:
> > >>> >>> >> >> > > >
> > >>> >>> >> >> > > > smoke - Laura, Radek, Prashant, Venky
> (POOL_APP_NOT_ENABLE failures)
> > >>> >>> >> >> > > > rados - Neha, Radek, Travis, Ernesto, Adam King
> > >>> >>> >> >> > > > rgw - Casey
> > >>> >>> >> >> > > > fs - Venky
> > >>> >>> >> >> > > > orch - Adam King
> > >>> >>> >> >> > > > rbd - Ilya
> > >>> >>> >> >> > > > krbd - Ilya
> > >>> >>> >> >> > > > upgrade/quincy-x (reef) - Laura PTL
> > >>> >>> >> >> > > > powercycle - Brad
> > >>> >>> >> >> > > > perf-basic - Laura, Prashant (POOL_APP_NOT_ENABLE
> failures)
> > >>> >>> >> >> > > >
> > >>> >>> >> >> > > > Please reply to this email with approval and/or
> trackers of known
> > >>> >>> >> >> > > > issues/PRs to address them.
> > >>> >>> >> >> > > >
> > >>> >>> >> >> > > > TIA
> > >>> >>> >> >> > > > YuriW
> > >>> >>> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________
> > >>> >>> >> >> > > > Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx
> > >>> >>> >> >> > > > To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
> > >>> >>> >> >> > > >
> > >>> >>> >> >> > >
> > >>> >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________
> > >>> >>> >> >> > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
> > >>> >>> >> >> > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
> > >>> >>> >> >>
> > >>> >>> >> >>
> > >>> >>> >> >>
> > >>> >>> >> >> --
> > >>> >>> >> >> Cheers,
> > >>> >>> >> >> Venky
> > >>> >>> >> >>
> > >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________
> > >>> >>> >> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
> > >>> >>> >> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
> > >>> >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> >>> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
> > >>> >>> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
> > >>>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
> Unless otherwise stated above:
>
> Compagnie IBM France
> Siège Social : 17, avenue de l'Europe, 92275 Bois-Colombes Cedex
> RCS Nanterre 552 118 465
> Forme Sociale : S.A.S.
> Capital Social : 664 069 390,60 €
> SIRET : 552 118 465 03644 - Code NAF 6203Z
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux