Re: reef 18.2.1 QE Validation status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



dashboard approved. Failure known and unrelated!

On Tue, Nov 14, 2023, 22:34 Adam King <adking@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> orch approved.  After reruns, orch/cephadm was just hitting two known
> (nonblocker) issues and orch/rook teuthology suite is known to not be
> functional currently.
>
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 10:33 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> Build 4 with https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/54224 was built and I
>> ran the tests below and asking for approvals:
>>
>> smoke - Laura
>> rados/mgr - PASSED
>> rados/dashboard - Nizamudeen
>> orch - Adam King
>>
>> See Build 4 runs - https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/63443#note-1
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 12:21 AM Redouane Kachach <rkachach@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Yes, cephadm has some tests for monitoring that should be enough to
>> ensure basic functionality is working properly. The rest of the changes in
>> the PR are for rook orchestrator.
>> >
>> > On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 5:04 AM Nizamudeen A <nia@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> dashboard changes are minimal and approved. and since the dashboard
>> change is related to the
>> >> monitoring stack (prometheus..) which is something not covered in the
>> dashboard test suites, I don't think running it is necessary.
>> >> But maybe the cephadm suite has some monitoring stack related testings
>> written?
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 1:10 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Ack Travis.
>> >>>
>> >>> Since it touches a dashboard, Nizam - please reply/approve.
>> >>>
>> >>> I assume that rados/dashboard tests will be sufficient, but expecting
>> >>> your recommendations.
>> >>>
>> >>> This addition will make the final release likely to be pushed.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 11:30 AM Travis Nielsen <tnielsen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> >>> >
>> >>> > I'd like to see these changes for much improved dashboard
>> integration with Rook. The changes are to the rook mgr orchestrator module,
>> and supporting test changes. Thus, this should be very low risk to the ceph
>> release. I don't know the details of the tautology suites, but I would
>> think suites involving the mgr modules would only be necessary.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Travis
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 12:14 PM Yuri Weinstein <
>> yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Redouane
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> What would be a sufficient level of testing (tautology suite(s))
>> >>> >> assuming this PR is approved to be added?
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 9:13 AM Redouane Kachach <
>> rkachach@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > Hi Yuri,
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > I've just backported to reef several fixes that I introduced in
>> the last months for the rook orchestrator. Most of them are fixes for
>> dashboard issues/crashes that only happen on Rook environments. The PR [1]
>> has all the changes and it was merged into reef this morning. We really
>> need these changes to be part of the next reef release as the upcoming Rook
>> stable version will be based on it.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > Please, can you include those changes in the upcoming reef
>> 18.2.1 release?
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > [1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/54224
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > Thanks a lot,
>> >>> >> > Redouane.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 6:03 PM Yuri Weinstein <
>> yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> >>> >> >> From: Venky Shankar <vshankar@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >>> >> >> Date: Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 11:52 PM
>> >>> >> >> Subject: Re:  Re: reef 18.2.1 QE Validation status
>> >>> >> >> To: Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >>> >> >> Cc: dev <dev@xxxxxxx>, ceph-users <ceph-users@xxxxxxx>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> Hi Yuri,
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 4:55 AM Yuri Weinstein <
>> yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> > I've updated all approvals and merged PRs in the tracker and
>> it looks
>> >>> >> >> > like we are ready for gibba, LRC upgrades pending
>> approval/update from
>> >>> >> >> > Venky.
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> The smoke test failure is caused by missing (kclient) patches in
>> >>> >> >> Ubuntu 20.04 that certain parts of the fs suite (via smoke
>> tests) rely
>> >>> >> >> on. More details here
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>         https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/63488#note-8
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> The kclient tests in smoke pass with other distro's and the fs
>> suite
>> >>> >> >> tests have been reviewed and look good. Run details are here
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> https://tracker.ceph.com/projects/cephfs/wiki/Reef#07-Nov-2023
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> The smoke failure is noted as a known issue for now. Consider
>> this run
>> >>> >> >> as "fs approved".
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> > On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 1:31 PM Radoslaw Zarzynski <
>> rzarzyns@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>> >> >> > >
>> >>> >> >> > > rados approved!
>> >>> >> >> > >
>> >>> >> >> > > Details are here:
>> https://tracker.ceph.com/projects/rados/wiki/REEF#1821-Review.
>> >>> >> >> > >
>> >>> >> >> > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 10:33 PM Yuri Weinstein <
>> yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>> >> >> > > >
>> >>> >> >> > > > Details of this release are summarized here:
>> >>> >> >> > > >
>> >>> >> >> > > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/63443#note-1
>> >>> >> >> > > >
>> >>> >> >> > > > Seeking approvals/reviews for:
>> >>> >> >> > > >
>> >>> >> >> > > > smoke - Laura, Radek, Prashant, Venky
>> (POOL_APP_NOT_ENABLE failures)
>> >>> >> >> > > > rados - Neha, Radek, Travis, Ernesto, Adam King
>> >>> >> >> > > > rgw - Casey
>> >>> >> >> > > > fs - Venky
>> >>> >> >> > > > orch - Adam King
>> >>> >> >> > > > rbd - Ilya
>> >>> >> >> > > > krbd - Ilya
>> >>> >> >> > > > upgrade/quincy-x (reef) - Laura PTL
>> >>> >> >> > > > powercycle - Brad
>> >>> >> >> > > > perf-basic - Laura, Prashant (POOL_APP_NOT_ENABLE
>> failures)
>> >>> >> >> > > >
>> >>> >> >> > > > Please reply to this email with approval and/or trackers
>> of known
>> >>> >> >> > > > issues/PRs to address them.
>> >>> >> >> > > >
>> >>> >> >> > > > TIA
>> >>> >> >> > > > YuriW
>> >>> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________
>> >>> >> >> > > > Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx
>> >>> >> >> > > > To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
>> >>> >> >> > > >
>> >>> >> >> > >
>> >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >>> >> >> > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
>> >>> >> >> > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> --
>> >>> >> >> Cheers,
>> >>> >> >> Venky
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >>> >> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
>> >>> >> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
>> >>> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux