On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 02:37:59PM -0400, Matt Benjamin wrote: > Yes, it's also strongly consistent. It's also last writer wins, though, so > two clients somehow permitted to contend for updating policy could > overwrite each other's changes, just as with objects. Hi, thank you for confirming this! Matthias > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 2:21 PM Matthias Ferdinand <mf+ml.ceph@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > while I don't currently use rgw, I still am curious about consistency > > guarantees. > > > > Usually, S3 has strong read-after-write consistency guarantees (for > > requests that do not overlap). According to > > https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/dev/radosgw/bucket_index/ > > in Ceph this is also true for per-object ACLs. > > > > Is there also a strong consistency guarantee for (bucket) policies? The > > documentation at > > https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/radosgw/bucketpolicy/ > > apparently does not say anything about this. > > > > How would multiple rgw instances synchronize a policy change? Is this > > effective immediate with strong consistency or is there some propagation > > delay (hopefully on with some upper bound)? > > > > > > Best regards > > Matthias > > _______________________________________________ > > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx > > > > > > -- > > Matt Benjamin > Red Hat, Inc. > 315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A > Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103 > > http://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/storage > > tel. 734-821-5101 > fax. 734-769-8938 > cel. 734-216-5309 _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |