Re: cephadm and kernel memory usage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Without determining what exactly process (kernel or userspace) "eat" memory, the ceph-users can't tell what exactly use memory, because don't see your display with your eyes 🙂

You should run this commands on good & bad hosts to see the real difference. This may be related to kernel version, or Ceph options in container config or ...


k
Sent from my iPhone

> On 26 Jul 2023, at 07:26, Luis Domingues <luis.domingues@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> First, thank you for taking time to reply to me.
> 
> However, my question was not on user-space memory neither on cache usage, as I can see on my machines everything sums up quite nicely.
> 
> My question is: with packages, the non-cache kernel memory is around 2G to 3G, while with Podman usage, it is more around 10G, and it can go up to 40G-50G. Do anyone knows if this is expected and why this is the case?
> 
> Maybe this is a podman related question and ceph-dev is not the best place to ask this kind of question, but maybe someone using cephadm saw similar behavior.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux