Re: Adding datacenter level to CRUSH tree causes rebalancing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I can believe the month timeframe for a cluster with multiple large spinners behind each HBA.  I’ve witnessed such personally.

I do have the numbers for this:

My original post showed "1167541260/1595506041 objects misplaced (73.177%)".

During my last recovery with Ceph 16.2.7, the recovery speed was:

* 150 objects/s with osd_max_backfills = 1
* 350 objects/s with osd_max_backfills = 6

Computing: 1167541260 / 350 / 3600 / 24 = 38 days.

The hardware is 3 machines * (19 HDDs * 16 TB), with 10 Gbit/s networking.

The reason it is slow is that there are many small files == objects, and Ceph does a seek for each object during scrubbing and recovery (see https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/59584).
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux