Re: Bottleneck between loadbalancer and rgws

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 02:19:14PM +0000, Szabo, Istvan (Agoda) wrote:
I'll try to increase in my small cluster, let's see is there any improvement there, thank you.

Any reason if has memory enough to not increase?

I tried to find where I read it but with no luck.
I think it said it's more beneficial to run more RGW on same host than
increasing rgw_max_concurrent_requests without any explanation.

In my search for where I read it I did find this

https://ceph.io/en/news/blog/2022/three-large-scale-clusters/
witch links to
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/54124

And here they set rgw_max_concurrent_requests to 10240
https://www.seagate.com/content/dam/seagate/migrated-assets/www-content/solutions/partners/red-hat/_shared/files/st-seagate-rhcs5-detail-f29951wg-202110-en.pdf

So I think the only way to find out it to increase it and see what happens.

--
Kai Stian Olstad
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux