Re: CEPH Version choice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/15/23 12:11, Frank Schilder wrote:
> Because more often than not it isn't.

Sadly, I have to agree. We basically gave up after luminous, where every
update (on our test-ceph cluster) was a major pain. Until then, we
always updated after one week of a new release.

To add one more point..

The current Ceph version (17.x) will not be included in the upcoming
Debian 12 release to be released later this summer. This hasn't been a
problem in the past, because we just built our own backports and
everything was fine.

Nowadays, Ceph 17 doesn't even build on Debian unstable/testing because
some libraries (mostly fmtlib and others) are too new (sic!), so.. we'll
be staying with Ceph 16 on Debian 12 until we'll trash the hardware.

..or in other words: it would be nice if you could more efforts into
upgrade-tests/QA as well as on releasing stuff that actually compiles on
non-RHEL/current Linux distributions.

Regards,
Daniel
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux