Re: Deep-scrub much slower than HDD speed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi all,

Scrubs only read data that does exist in ceph as it exists, not every sector of the drive, written or not.

Thanks, this does explain it.

I just discovered:

ZFS had this problem in the past:

* https://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/solaris/ZFSNonlinearScrubs?showcomments#comments

OpenZFS solved it in 2017, using two-phase scrubs:

* https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/3625
* https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/commit/d4a72f23863382bdf6d0ae33196f5b5decbc48fd

Perhaps Ceph can use the same approach; I filed https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/59584 for it.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux