As far as I know, we have no plans to productize (or even test) on
CephFS. It should work, but CephFS isn't pure POSIX, so there may be
issues.
Daniel
On 3/6/23 11:57, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
+1. If I know radosgw on top of cephfs is a thing, I may change some plans. Is that the planned route?
Thanks,
Kevin
________________________________________
From: Daniel Gryniewicz <dang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, March 6, 2023 6:21 AM
To: Kai Stian Olstad
Cc: ceph-users@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: s3 compatible interface
Check twice before you click! This email originated from outside PNNL.
On 3/3/23 13:53, Kai Stian Olstad wrote:
On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 08:39:56AM -0500, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
We're actually writing this for RGW right now. It'll be a bit before
it's productized, but it's in the works.
Just curious, what is the use cases for this feature?
S3 against CephFS?
Local FS for development use, and distributed FS (initial target is
GPFS) for production. There's no current plans to make it work against
CephFS, although I would imagine it will work fine. But if you have a
Ceph cluster, you're much better off using standard RGW on RADOS.
Daniel
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
