+1. If I know radosgw on top of cephfs is a thing, I may change some plans. Is that the planned route? Thanks, Kevin ________________________________________ From: Daniel Gryniewicz <dang@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, March 6, 2023 6:21 AM To: Kai Stian Olstad Cc: ceph-users@xxxxxxx Subject: Re: s3 compatible interface Check twice before you click! This email originated from outside PNNL. On 3/3/23 13:53, Kai Stian Olstad wrote: > On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 08:39:56AM -0500, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: >> We're actually writing this for RGW right now. It'll be a bit before >> it's productized, but it's in the works. > > Just curious, what is the use cases for this feature? > S3 against CephFS? > Local FS for development use, and distributed FS (initial target is GPFS) for production. There's no current plans to make it work against CephFS, although I would imagine it will work fine. But if you have a Ceph cluster, you're much better off using standard RGW on RADOS. Daniel _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |