Re: OpenSSL in librados

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 8:20 AM Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 2:15 PM Patrick Schlangen <patrick@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ilya,
> >
> > > Am 26.02.2023 um 14:05 schrieb Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > >
> > > Isn't OpenSSL 1.0 long out of support?  I'm not sure if extending
> > > librados API to support a workaround for something that went EOL over
> > > three years ago is worth it.
> >
> > fair point. However, as long as ceph still supports compiling against OpenSSL 1.0 and has special code paths to initialize OpenSSL for versions <= 1.0, I think this should be fixed. The other option would be to remove OpenSSL 1.0 support completely.
> >
> > What do you think?
>
> Removing OpenSSL 1.0 support is fine with me but it would need a wider
> discussion.  I'm CCing the development list.
>
> Thanks,
>
>                 Ilya
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
>

if librados still works with openssl 1.0 when you're not using it
elsewhere in the process, i don't see a compelling reason to break
that. maybe just add a #warning about it to librados.h?
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux