So here is some more weirdness: I've piped a list of all omapkeys into a file: (dedacted customer data with placeholders in <>) # grep -aFn '<PARENT>/<FOLDER>/<FIRST_PART_OF_FILE>' omapkeys_list 9844:<PARENT>/<FOLDER>/<FIRST_PART_OF_FILE> 9845:<PARENT>/<FOLDER>/<FIRST_PART_OF_FILE>v913<SECOND_PART> 88010:�1000_<PARENT>/<FOLDER>/<FIRST_PART_OF_FILE><SECOND_PART> 128981:�1001_<PARENT>/<FOLDER>/<FIRST_PART_OF_FILE> # grep -aFn '<PARENT>/<FOLDER><FIRST_PART_OF_FILE><SECOND_PART>' omapkeys_list <Returns nothing> # vim omapkeys_list +88010 (copy pasted from terminal) <80>1000_<PARENT>/<FOLDER>/<FIRST_PART_OF_FILE>^@<SECOND_PART> Any idea what this is? Am Mo., 13. Feb. 2023 um 13:57 Uhr schrieb Boris Behrens <bb@xxxxxxxxx>: > Hi, > I have one bucket that showed up with a large omap warning, but the amount > of objects in the bucket, does not align with the amount of omap keys. The > bucket is sharded to get rid of the "large omapkeys" warning. > > I've counted all the omapkeys of one bucket and it came up with 33.383.622 > (rados -p INDEXPOOL listomapkeys INDEXOBJECT | wc -l) > I've checked the amount of actual rados objects and it came up with > 17.095.877 > (rados -p DATAPOOL ls | grep BUCKETMARKER | wc -l) > I've checked the bucket index and it came up with 16.738.482 > (radosgw-admin bi list --bucket BUCKET | grep -F '"idx":' | wc -l) > > I have tried to fix it with > radosgw-admin bucket check --check-objects --fix --bucket BUCKET > but this did not change anything. > > Is this a known bug or might there be something else going on. How can I > investigate further? > > Cheers > Boris > -- > Die Selbsthilfegruppe "UTF-8-Probleme" trifft sich diesmal abweichend im > groüen Saal. > -- Die Selbsthilfegruppe "UTF-8-Probleme" trifft sich diesmal abweichend im groüen Saal. _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |