Hi Tyler, thanks for clarifying, it makes total sense now. Hypothetically, if there are any failures and most stop, how can I re-initialize the cluster in its current state or what can be done in this kind of case? Em qui., 3 de nov. de 2022 às 17:00, Tyler Brekke <tbrekke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > Hi Murilo, > > Since we need a majority to maintain a quorum when you lost 2 mons, you > only had 50% available and lost quorum. This is why all recommendations > specify having an odd number of mons. As you do not get any added > availability with 4 instead of 3. If you had 5 mons, you can lose two > without losing availability. > > > On Thu, Nov 3, 2022, 2:55 PM Murilo Morais <murilo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Good afternoon everyone! >> >> I have a lab with 4 mons, I was testing the behavior in case a certain >> amount of hosts went offline, as soon as the second one went offline >> everything stopped. It would be interesting if there was a fifth node to >> ensure that, if two fall, everything will work, but why did everything >> stop >> with only 2 nodes when if there were 3 nodes in the cluster and one fell, >> everything would still be working? Is there no way to get this behavior >> with 4 nodes? >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx >> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx >> > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |