Hi Kevin, > Isn't this one of the reasons containers were pushed, so that the > packaging isn't as big a deal? > Yes, but the Ceph community has a strong commitment to provide distro packages for those users who are not interested in moving to containers. Is it the continued push to support lots of distros without using > containers that is the problem? > If not a problem, it definitely makes it more challenging. Compiled components often sort this out by statically linking deps whose packages are not widely available in distros. The approach we're proposing here would be the closest equivalent to static linking for interpreted code (bundling). Thanks for sharing your questions! Kind regards, Ernesto _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |